Systematic analysis of cuproptosis abnormalities and functional significance in cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cuproptosis is a recently discovered type of cell death, but the role and behavior of cuproptosis-related genes (CuRGs) in cancers remain unclear. This paper aims to address these issues by analyzing the multi-omics characteristics of cancer-related genes (CuRGs) across various types of cancer. METHOD: To investigate the impact of somatic copy number alterations (SCNA) and DNA methylation on CRG expression, we will analyze the correlation between these factors. We developed a cuproptosis index (CPI) model to measure the level of cuproptosis and investigate its functional roles. Using this model, we assessed the clinical prognosis of colorectal cancer patients and analyzed genetic changes and immune infiltration features in different CPI levels. RESULTS: The study's findings indicate that the majority of cancer-related genes (CuRGs) were suppressed in tumors and had a positive correlation with somatic copy number alterations (SCNA), while having a negative correlation with DNA methylation. This suggests that both SCNA and DNA methylation have an impact on the expression of CuRGs. The CPI model is a reliable predictor of survival outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer and can serve as an independent prognostic factor. Patients with a higher CPI have a worse prognosis. We conducted a deeper analysis of the genetic alterations and immune infiltration patterns in both CPI positive and negative groups. Our findings revealed significant differences, indicating that CuRGs may play a crucial role in tumor immunity mechanisms. Additionally, we have noticed a positive correlation between CuRGs and various crucial pathways that are linked to the occurrence, progression, and metastasis of tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study systematically analyzes cuproptosis and its regulatory genes, emphasizing the potential of using cuproptosis as a basis for cancer therapy.

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Histologic Diagnosis System for Diagnosing Colorectal Sessile Serrated Lesions.

OBJECTIVES: The histopathologic diagnosis of colorectal sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) and hyperplastic polyps (HPs) is of low consistency among pathologists. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL)-based logical anthropomorphic pathology diagnostic system (LA-SSLD) for the differential diagnosis of colorectal SSL and HP. METHODS: The diagnosis framework of the LA-SSLD system was constructed according to the current guidelines and consisted of 4 DL models. Deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) 1 was the mucosal layer segmentation model, DCNN 2 was the muscularis mucosa segmentation model, DCNN 3 was the glandular lumen segmentation model, and DCNN 4 was the glandular lumen classification (aberrant or regular) model. A total of 175 HP and 127 SSL sections were collected from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University during November 2016 to November 2022. The performance of the LA-SSLD system was compared to 11 pathologists with different qualifications through the human-machine contest. RESULTS: The Dice scores of DCNNs 1, 2, and 3 were 93.66%, 58.38%, and 74.04%, respectively. The accuracy of DCNN 4 was 92.72%. In the human-machine contest, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the LA-SSLD system were 85.71%, 86.36%, and 85.00%, respectively. In comparison with experts (pathologist D: accuracy 83.33%, sensitivity 90.91%, specificity 75.00%; pathologist E: accuracy 85.71%, sensitivity 90.91%, specificity 80.00%), LA-SSLD achieved expert-level accuracy and outperformed all the senior and junior pathologists. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposed a logical anthropomorphic diagnostic system for the differential diagnosis of colorectal SSL and HP. The diagnostic performance of the system is comparable to that of experts and has the potential to become a powerful diagnostic tool for SSL in the future. It is worth mentioning that a logical anthropomorphic system can achieve expert-level accuracy with fewer samples, providing potential ideas for the development of other artificial intelligence models.

Complementary Effect of the Proportion of Overspeed Frames of Withdrawal and Withdrawal Time on Reflecting Colonoscopy Quality: A Retrospective, Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Constructing quality indicators that reflect the defect of colonoscopy operation for quality audit and feedback is very important. Previously, we have established a real-time withdrawal speed monitoring system to control withdrawal speed below the safe speed. We aimed to explore the relationship between the proportion of overspeed frames (POF) of withdrawal and the adenoma detection rate (ADR) and to conjointly analyze the influence of POF and withdrawal time on ADR to evaluate the feasibility of POF combined with withdrawal time as a quality control indicator. METHODS: The POF was defined as the proportion of frames with instantaneous speed ≥44 in the whole colonoscopy video. First, we developed a system for the POF of withdrawal based on a perceptual hashing algorithm. Next, we retrospectively collected 1,804 colonoscopy videos to explore the relationship between POF and ADR. According to withdrawal time and POF cutoff, we conducted a complementary analysis on the effects of POF and withdrawal time on ADR. RESULTS: There was an inverse correlation between the POF and ADR (Pearson correlation coefficient -0.836). When withdrawal time was >6 minutes, the ADR of the POF ≤10% was significantly higher than that of POF >10% (25.30% vs 16.50%; odds ratio 0.463, 95% confidence interval 0.296-0.724, P < 0.01). When the POF was ≤10%, the ADR of withdrawal time >6 minutes was higher than that of withdrawal time ≤6 minutes (25.30% vs 21.14%; odds ratio 0.877, 95% confidence interval 0.667-1.153, P = 0.35). DISCUSSION: The POF was strongly correlated with ADR. The combined assessment of the POF and withdrawal time has profound significance for colonoscopy quality control.

Development and validation of an artificial intelligence-based system for predicting colorectal cancer invasion depth using multi-modal data.

OBJECTIVES: Accurate endoscopic optical prediction of the depth of cancer invasion is critical for guiding an optimal treatment approach of large sessile colorectal polyps but was hindered by insufficient endoscopists expertise and inter-observer variability. We aimed to construct a clinically applicable artificial intelligence (AI) system for the identification of presence of cancer invasion in large sessile colorectal polyps. METHODS: A deep learning-based colorectal cancer invasion calculation (CCIC) system was constructed. Multi-modal data including clinical information, white light (WL) and image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) were included for training. The system was trained using 339 lesions and tested on 198 lesions across three hospitals. Man-machine contest, reader study and video validation were further conducted to evaluate the performance of CCIC. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of CCIC system using image and video validation was 90.4% and 89.7%, respectively. In comparison with 14 endoscopists, the accuracy of CCIC was comparable with expert endoscopists but superior to all the participating senior and junior endoscopists in both image and video validation set. With CCIC augmentation, the average accuracy of junior endoscopists improved significantly from 75.4% to 85.3% (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This deep learning-based CCIC system may play an important role in predicting the depth of cancer invasion in colorectal polyps, thus determining treatment strategies for these large sessile colorectal polyps.

Development and validation of a feature extraction-based logical anthropomorphic diagnostic system for early gastric cancer: A case-control study.

Background: Prompt diagnosis of early gastric cancer (EGC) is crucial for improving patient survival. However, most previous computer-aided-diagnosis (CAD) systems did not concretize or explain diagnostic theories. We aimed to develop a logical anthropomorphic artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic system named ENDOANGEL-LA (logical anthropomorphic) for EGCs under magnifying image enhanced endoscopy (M-IEE). Methods: We retrospectively collected data for 692 patients and 1897 images from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China between Nov 15, 2016 and May 7, 2019. The images were randomly assigned to the training set and test set by patient with a ratio of about 4:1. ENDOANGEL-LA was developed based on feature extraction combining quantitative analysis, deep learning (DL), and machine learning (ML). 11 diagnostic feature indexes were integrated into seven ML models, and an optimal model was selected. The performance of ENDOANGEL-LA was evaluated and compared with endoscopists and sole DL models. The satisfaction of endoscopists on ENDOANGEL-LA and sole DL model was also compared. Findings: Random forest showed the best performance, and demarcation line and microstructures density were the most important feature indexes. The accuracy of ENDOANGEL-LA in images (88.76%) was significantly higher than that of sole DL model (82.77%, p = 0.034) and the novices (71.63%, p<0.001), and comparable to that of the experts (88.95%). The accuracy of ENDOANGEL-LA in videos (87.00%) was significantly higher than that of the sole DL model (68.00%, p<0.001), and comparable to that of the endoscopists (89.00%). The accuracy (87.45%, p<0.001) of novices with the assistance of ENDOANGEL-LA was significantly improved. The satisfaction of endoscopists on ENDOANGEL-LA was significantly higher than that of sole DL model. Interpretation: We established a logical anthropomorphic system (ENDOANGEL-LA) that can diagnose EGC under M-IEE with diagnostic theory concretization, high accuracy, and good explainability. It has the potential to increase interactivity between endoscopists and CADs, and improve trust and acceptability of endoscopists for CADs. Funding: This work was partly supported by a grant from the Hubei Province Major Science and Technology Innovation Project (2018-916-000-008) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2042021kf0084).

Effect of an artificial intelligence-based quality improvement system on efficacy of a computer-aided detection system in colonoscopy: a four-group parallel study.

BACKGROUND: Tandem colonoscopy studies have found that about one in five adenomas are missed at colonoscopy. It remains debatable whether the combination of a computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) system with a computer-aided quality improvement (CAQ) system for real-time monitoring of withdrawal speed results in additional benefits in adenoma detection or if the synergetic effect may be harmed due to excessive visual burden resulting from information overload. This study aimed to evaluate the interaction effect on improving the adenoma detection rate (ADR). METHODS: This single-center, randomized, four-group, parallel, controlled study was performed at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. Between 1 July and 15 October 2020, 1076 patients were randomly allocated into four treatment groups: control 271, CADe 268, CAQ 269, and CADe plus CAQ (COMBO) 268. The primary outcome was ADR. RESULTS: The ADR in the control, CADe, CAQ, and COMBO groups was 14.76 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 10.54 to 18.98), 21.27 % (95 %CI 16.37 to 26.17), 24.54 % (95 %CI 19.39 to 29.68), and 30.60 % (95 %CI 25.08 to 36.11), respectively. The ADR was higher in the COMBO group compared with the CADe group (21.27 % vs. 30.6 %, P = 0.024, odds ratio [OR] 1.284, 95 %CI 1.033 to 1.596) but not compared with the CAQ group (24.54 % vs. 30.6 %, P = 0.213, OR 1.309, 95 %CI 0.857 to 2.000, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CAQ significantly improved the efficacy of CADe in a four-group, parallel, controlled study. No significant difference in the ADR or polyp detection rate was found between CAQ and COMBO.

Evidence Based Social Science in China Paper 4 : The quality of social science systematic reviews and meta-analysis published from 2000-2019.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the characteristics, methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in social science journals in China. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI) databases were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analysis published between January 2000 and December 2019. We randomly selected 200 articles from the 401 identified in our search. The Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklists were used to assess the methodological and reporting quality, respectively. RESULTS: The 200 articles we selected covered a wide range of research fields in 9 disciplines, most of which belonged to management, education and psychology. The mean AMSTAR score and PRISMA score was 8.99 ± 3.36 points and 14.74 ± 3.96 points, respectively. These findings indicated that the quality of the systematic reviews was below the average level. Meanwhile, year of publication was related to both methodological quality (P = 0.001) and reporting quality (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Although many systematic reviews and meta-analysis have been published in top Chinese journals, the methodological and reporting quality is troubling. Thus, the most urgent task is to increase the standard of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of every discipline rather than continuing to publish them in great quantity.

Multi-step validation of a deep learning-based system for the quantification of bowel preparation: a prospective, observational study.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate bowel preparation is associated with a decrease in adenoma detection rate (ADR). A deep learning-based bowel preparation assessment system based on the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) has been previously established to calculate the automatic BBPS (e-BBPS) score (ranging 0-20). The aims of this study were to investigate whether there was a statistically inverse relationship between the e-BBPS score and the ADR, and to determine the threshold of e-BBPS score for adequate bowel preparation in colonoscopy screening. METHODS: In this prospective, observational study, we trained and internally validated the e-BBPS system using retrospective colonoscopy images and videos from the Endoscopy Center of Wuhan University, annotated by endoscopists. We externally validated the system using colonoscopy images and videos from the First People's Hospital of Yichang and the Third Hospital of Wuhan. To prospectively validate the system, we recruited consecutive patients at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University aged between 18 and 75 years undergoing colonoscopy. The exclusion criteria included: contraindication to colonoscopy, family polyposis syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, history of surgery for colorectal or colorectal cancer, known or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation, patients who were pregnant or lactating, inability to receive caecal intubation, and lumen obstruction. We did colonoscopy procedures and collected withdrawal videos, which were reviewed and the e-BBPS system was applied to all colon segments. The primary outcome of this study was ADR, defined as the proportion of patients with one or more conventional adenomas detected during colonoscopy. We calculated the ADR of each e-BBPS score and did a correlation analysis using Spearman analysis. FINDINGS: From May 11 to Aug 10, 2020, 616 patients underwent screening colonoscopies, which evaluated. There was a significant inverse correlation between the e-BBPS score and ADR (Spearman's rank -0·976, p<0·010). The ADR for the e-BBPS scores 1-8 was 28·57%, 28·68%, 26·79%, 19·19%, 17·57%, 17·07%, 14·81%, and 0%, respectively. According to the 25% ADR standard for screening colonoscopy, an e-BBPS score of 3 was set as a threshold to guarantee an ADR of more than 25%, and so high-quality endoscopy. Patients with scores of more than 3 had a significantly lower ADR than those with a score of 3 or less (ADR 15·93% vs 28·03%, p<0·001, 95% CI 0·28-0·66, odds ratio 0·43). INTERPRETATION: The e-BBPS system has potential to provide a more objective and refined threshold for the quantification of adequate bowel preparation. FUNDING: Project of Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision and Hubei Province Major Science and Technology Innovation Project.